The phonics literacy check directed to first-year schoolchildren in England has had a negligible influence on reading and composing standards, according to teachers in a Department for Education-funded review, leading learning unions to recount it as a waste of time and money.
The survey, undertook in the first year that the phonics screening ascertain has been granted to all five- and six-year-olds in state-funded primary schools, discloses continued disquiet amidst teachers and literacy co-ordinators over the utility of the check, alongside clear-cut indifference from parents.
"Most of the educators consulted as part of the case-study visits to schools described that the check would have minimal, if any, influence on the benchmark of reading and composing in their school in the future," the interim report, conducted by the National base for Education Research, concludes.
A majority – 52% – of school literacy co-ordinators surveyed contradicted with the declaration "the phonics screening check presents valuable information for teachers", while only a quarter acquiesced. Most teachers favoured to use their records or other means of assessment to measure a child's progress, with only half saying they utilised the test outcomes to referee if a student needed extra support.
One educator consulted in the survey's follow-up case study was cited as saying: "The ascertain had no impact on me personally. I understand precisely where the young kids are anyway. There were no shocks in the facts and figures and [it revealed] not anything we didn't already know."
While many educators are powerful supporters of phonics, a teaching procedure that engages pupils examining each letter within a phrase as an one-by-one sound and blending the noise simultaneously in articulation, many stay unconvinced of the need for a test or ascertain on young kids as young as five, or in using the DfE's favoured method, known as synthetic phonics, solely.
Christine Blower
Christine Blower, NUT general receptionist, says the report will be painful reading for the government. Photograph: Sean Smith for the Guardian
Christine Blower, the general receptionist of the nationwide amalgamation of educators, said the review suggested the ascertain was a waste of cash.
"This report will make for very painful reading by Michael Gove as it has very little to state that is affirmative about the phonics check," she said. "The NUT acquiesces with numerous of the findings, in particular the key conclusions that schools believe the check presents no new data on students' proficiency and that phonics should be utilised alongside other procedures in the teaching of reading."
Russell interest, the general receptionist of the nationwide Association of Head educators, called the tests a waste of time. "We have glimpsed nonsense phrases plastered on the partitions of good primary schools to get young kids used to the concept of phrases that don't make sense. What on soil are we being forced to educate children?" he said.
The mean cost of administering the ascertain was £740 per school, with one school reporting a cost of more than £20,400, whereas the survey's authors said that number likely included expending on phonics teaching assets. Others expended £5,000 on educating supply cover. Schools reported an average of eight hours expended administering the check.
A spokesman for the DfE sharp out that 80% of literacy co-ordinators said the outcomes of the ascertain would endow them to recognise young kids who required additional help.
"The phonics check double-checks young kids labouring with reading get the help they despairingly need. Last year's ascertain – when teachers recognised more than 235,000 six-year-olds behind on reading – illustrated its value," the DfE said.
Teachers were split up over the utility of the test for pupils with more sophisticated levels of reading understanding, with as many saying the ascertain was inappropriate as those who thought it was befitting.
The review also revealed concerns that the use of "pseudo phrases" in the check may be bewildering for advanced readers or children talking English as an added language. Made-up phrases, such as "halp" or "flarp", are included in the ascertain to test a child's proficiency to combine sounds, rather than rely on reading a phrase they may already recognise.
Several educators described troubles over the pseudo phrases, which comprise 20 of the 40 phrases tested. "They [the children] endeavoured to make the pseudo phrases fit certain thing they knew, for example by altering 'proom' to 'groom'," according to one educator.
Others said young kids talking English as an additional language furthermore had difficulty acclimatizing to the pseudo words. According to one educator some children asserted the made-up phrases "were genuine phrases, like 'desh' – so we don't understand whether in their own language that is a genuine phrase, or the articulation is a genuine phrase, and this bewildered those children".
young kids with talk, language or connection adversities or other discovering matters were also reported to have experienced troubles with the ascertain, and to have been bewildered by the pseudo words, while the survey found some clues of unsuitability of the ascertain for scholars with critical autism.
The review of almost 1,800 teachers and literacy co-ordinators will be recurring this year, along with meetings with parents.